Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6698107
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T06:32:19+00:00 2026-05-26T06:32:19+00:00

In answering this question , I suggested that the OP open a stream at

  • 0

In answering this question, I suggested that the OP open a stream at the beginning of his notebook and close it at the end. However, if an Abort is generated, the stream will be left open, and will cause havoc if they attempt to open it again without checking first. If the stream was only required for a single function, the solution would be straightforward, but it’s required for the entire notebook. Obviously, a check can be added to see if the stream is already open, but is there a way to tie into the global Abort handler so that this type of problem can be handled globally?

Edit: to be specific, I’m looking for a way to run arbitrary code when an Abort occurs whether, or not, the code is currently running inside of CheckAbort. Essentially, I’d like to set a global Abort handler, if possible. If this exists at the notebook level, then even better.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T06:32:19+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 6:32 am

    As an alternative, and if you want to localize the effect to a single notebook, you can do something along these lines:

    SetOptions[EvaluationNotebook[], 
       CellEvaluationFunction -> 
         (ToExpression[#, StandardForm,
             Function[
                Null,
                Module[{aborted = $Aborted},
                  Internal`WithLocalSettings[
                     Null,
                     aborted = (ReleaseHold[Most[Hold[##]]];Last[Hold[##]]),
                     AbortProtect[
                       If[aborted === $Aborted,
                          Print["Did cleanup"]; Abort[]
                       ]]]], 
                HoldAll]] &)
    ]
    

    NOTE: rewritten to incorporate the suggestion of @Alexey

    NOTE 2 Modified to accommodate several inputs in a single cell. In that case, all outputs but the last are suppressed

    where you replace the Print["Did cleanup"] code with whatever cleanup code you have.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Before answering this question, understand that I am not asking how to create my
While answering this question I noticed that I got the following dialog while atempting
In answering this question please take into consideration the fact that I'm an Android
In answering this question , I came across a situation that I don't understand.
While answering this question I noticed that I have never come across any property
While answering this question DOM parser: remove certain attributes only I noticed that some
I'll be answering this question To my great surprise, I discovered that, after using
In answering this question ( https://stackoverflow.com/questions/352317/c-coding-question#352327 ), it got me wondering... Is there any
In answering this question , it got me thinking... I often use this pattern:
While answering this question, I got these confusing results: double d = 0.49999999999999990d; //output

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.