Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 545045
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T10:43:11+00:00 2026-05-13T10:43:11+00:00

In ASP.NET MVC we can use the System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations namespace to assist with form/ model

  • 0

In ASP.NET MVC we can use the System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations namespace to assist with form/ model input validation.

If I didn’t want to be tied to any specific framework i.e. xVal, EntLib Val Block, etc. and I wanted to create basically a wrapper classes to protect my code from the direct dependency how would one accomplish that?

So instead of my model property looking like this;

[Required]
property string Name {get;set;}

I want it to be tied to my code where the validation framework preferred will be implemented.

[MyRequired]
property string Name {get;set;}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T10:43:12+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:43 am

    One way to do it is to derive your attribute from the underlying ones. EG:

    public class MyRequiredAttribute : EntLib.RequiredAttribute { }
    

    That way you could modify the MyRequiredAttribute class later to derive from a different base class, and the rest of your code wouldn’t need to change (you would probably however need to recompile it). The EntLib (etc) code that scans for EntLib.RequiredAttribute should still pick your derived attribute up

    This relies on the underlying attribute not being sealed though.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.