Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7562803
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T13:30:13+00:00 2026-05-30T13:30:13+00:00

In C/C++ like languages, closing zeromq socket explicitly is a must, which I understand.

  • 0

In C/C++ like languages, closing zeromq socket explicitly is a must, which I understand. But in some higher level languages, such as php and python, which have garbage collection mechanism, do I need to close the sockets explicitly?

In php, there is no ZMQSocket::close() and in python, pyzmq’s doc says socket.close() can be omitted since it will be closed automatically during garbage collection.

So my question is, do I need to manually close it or not?…

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T13:30:14+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 1:30 pm

    It is always correct to close any I/O resources when you are done with them. The garbage collector will close them off eventually. It may close it immediately once the last reference goes out of scope. It may close it as your program is exiting. While you wait for it to do so, the resource remains open taking up memory, consuming file pointers, and eating up your system resources in general. For a small, short lived program this may not be a big issue, but if your software is long living or establishes a lot of connections, this will come back to hurt you.

    The answer is: it depends. If your system is reliant on the socket getting closed, then you are safer closing them explicitly. If you are fine with the socket getting closed at some indeterminate future time, you can save yourself a little bit of coding time and simplify your program a bit by just letting the garbage collector handle it.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

It seems all scripting languages like PHP ,Perl doesn't build any syntax tree,but interpret
Languages like C and even C# (which technically doesn't have a preprocessor) allow you
in languages like PHP or Python there are convenient functions to turn an input
In languages like C++ and C# when you create a contain such as a
I have become interested in C-like languages for performance computing. Can you recommend some
I have selected some of the languages (like Hindi, English(India), English(United Kingdom) etc.) from
Since both are acceptable by HTML as well as languages like ASP.NET and PHP
Coming from more low-level languages like C++, and seeing how transparent .NET memory management
Could people please rank some programming languages like C,C++,Java,perl etc on benchmark line of
Some static languages like Java seem to have very special rules for variables defined

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.