Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 146253
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T08:34:09+00:00 2026-05-11T08:34:09+00:00

In C can a function expose memory that it manageds at a lower level

  • 0

In C can a function expose memory that it ‘manageds’ at a lower level as readonly to those calling that function (exposing its address). return * const is not effective but I wondered if I was overlooking a programming tick?

Thanks.

const uint8_t * get_value(int index)  { static uint8_t data[2] = {0, 0}; return (const uint8_t *)&data[index]; }  int main(void) { uint8_t * value; value = get_value(1);  *value += 1; return 0; } 

@j_random_hacker Suggested a good compromise to my question that gives that extra barrier I’m looking for to prevent casual mis-use of that data.

typedef struct {     const uint8_t * value;     const uint8_t size;  } readonly_t;  readonly_t get_value(int index, int size)  {     static uint8_t data[2] = {0, 0};     uint8_t rsize;      /* ... validate index, size params */      readonly_t r = { &data[index], rsize };     return r; } 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T08:34:10+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 8:34 am

    It’s C! You can’t 🙂 There is always a way to circumvent it. Just make it const and hope somebody will not change it.

    If you are hosting an add-in or something, you should run it in a separate process to limit its access to memory.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 102k
  • Answers 102k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The standard's statements about the order of execution are correct,… May 11, 2026 at 8:15 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer They don't take a commission. May 11, 2026 at 8:15 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer From your description I would guess you're not allocating the… May 11, 2026 at 8:15 pm

Related Questions

We host the .NET runtime as part of a Win32 program, and lately it
I have a C# class library that contains methods that need to be used
Here's my problem: I have to call a web service with a secure header
I have a class that is wrapped with swig, and registered with lua. I

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.