Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 861805
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T09:02:17+00:00 2026-05-15T09:02:17+00:00

In C++ do you always have to initialize a pointer to an object with

  • 0

In C++ do you always have to initialize a pointer to an object with the new keyword?

Or can you just have this too:

MyClass *myclass;

myclass->DoSomething();

I thought this was a pointer allocated on the stack instead of the heap, but since objects are normally heap-allocated, I think my theory is probably faulty?

Please advice.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T09:02:18+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 9:02 am

    No, you can have pointers to stack allocated objects:

    MyClass *myclass;
    MyClass c;
    myclass = & c;
    myclass->DoSomething();
    

    This is of course common when using pointers as function parameters:

    void f( MyClass * p ) {
        p->DoSomething();
    }
    
    int main() {
        MyClass c;
        f( & c );
    }
    

    One way or another though, the pointer must always be initialised. Your code:

    MyClass *myclass;
    myclass->DoSomething();
    

    leads to that dreaded condition, undefined behaviour.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 532k
  • Answers 532k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There may be a more concise way to do this,… May 17, 2026 at 12:08 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The virtual file system of (not only) linux uses a… May 17, 2026 at 12:08 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would say no, they are not the same concept,… May 17, 2026 at 12:08 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Say I have an object of type A having Initialize() method. The method receives
gcc 4.4.4 c89 I have always thought of using malloc for the life of
In C++ I have a reference to an object that wants to point back
I have a JFrame which contains a JPanel . The frame can be resized
I have just started reading through The C Programming Language and I am having
I have the following struct: struct Datastore_T { Partition_Datastores_T cmtDatastores; // bytes 0 to
let's say I have std::map< std::string, std::string > m_someMap as a private member variable
I always used to consider structures as some sort of lesser privileged things, or
I have a stripped down shopping cart application, currently with one model cart, the
I have a generic abstract base class from which I would like to derive

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.