Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 852599
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T07:37:25+00:00 2026-05-15T07:37:25+00:00

In C++, I have a certain template function that, on a given condition, calls

  • 0

In C++, I have a certain template function that, on a given condition, calls a template function in another class. The trouble is that the other class requires the full definition of the first class to be implemented, as it creates the second class and stores them and manages them in similar fashions.

The trouble is that naturally, they fall as one class, and thus have some tight interop, except that I need them to be two classes for threading reasons. A sort of, master for all threads, one child per thread, system.

Any advice on how this can be implemented?

Edit@comment:
I have a problem that looks a little like this:

class Master {
public:
    Child* CreateChild() {
        return new Child();
    }
    template<typename T> T* GetSomething(int arg) {
        return NULL;
    }
};
class Child {
    Master* master;
    template<typename T> T* GetSomething(int arg) {
        if (arg) return master->GetSomething<T>(arg);
        else return NULL;
    }
};

Those obviously aren’t the actual implementations, but similar enough to demonstrate. PIMPL would only help if these were non-template functions, but since they are, then the IMPL needs to be right here.

The Master class manages all the Children (why did I pick Master and Child instead of Parent/Child or Master/Slave?), their memory, lifetimes, etc, and a few other system-wide necessities. But the Child class provides the majority of access and in some cases must fall back to the Master class.

Also, there’s no way in hell that I’m going to move to dynamic bindings. The rest of my system already thoroughly abuses dynamic bindings to the absolute max, and I simply can’t afford the performance of using them again in this fashion. The Child function in question is called very, very, very often.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T07:37:26+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 7:37 am

    For your example, the fact that the classes have a template function makes no real difference; just have a forward reference to the Child class and put the definition of the CreateChild function after the declaration of the Child class:

    class Child;
    class Master {
    public:
        Child* CreateChild() ;
        template<typename T> T* GetSomething(int arg) {
            return NULL;
        }
    };
    
    class Child {
    public:
    
        Master* master;
        template<typename T> T* GetSomething(int arg) {
            if (arg) return master->GetSomething<T>(arg);
            else return NULL;
        }
    };
    
    Child* Master::CreateChild() {
        return new Child();
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 421k
  • Answers 421k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The best practice is to create them in the fixture… May 15, 2026 at 11:03 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Here's how I did it: Exported working copy to another… May 15, 2026 at 11:03 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There is no such library as I can see: http://developer.android.com/reference/android/media/package-summary.html May 15, 2026 at 11:03 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.