Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 147021
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T08:42:27+00:00 2026-05-11T08:42:27+00:00

In C++, I have a class which contains an anonymous bitfield struct. I want

  • 0

In C++, I have a class which contains an anonymous bitfield struct. I want to initialize it to zero without having to manually write out all fields.

I can imagine putting the initialization in three places:

  1. Create a constructor in the bitfield
  2. Zero out in the initializer list of the constructor for the containing class
  3. Zero out in the body of the constructor for the containing class

This bitfield has many fields, and I’d rather not list them all.

For example see the following code:

class Big {     public:         Big();          // Bitfield struct         struct bflag_struct {             unsigned int field1 : 1;             unsigned int field2 : 2;             unsigned int field3 : 1;             // ...             unsigned int field20 : 1;             // bflag_struct(); <--- Here?         } bflag;          unsigned int integer_member;         Big         *pointer_member; }  Big::Big()   : bflag(),             // <--- Can I zero bflag here?     integer_member(0),     pointer_member(NULL) {     // Or here? } 

Is one of these preferable? Or is there something else I’m missing?

Edit: Based on the accepted answer below (by Ferruccio) I settled on this solution:

class Big {     // ...      struct bflag_struct {         unsigned int field 1 : 1;         // ...         bflag_struct() { memset(this, 0, sizeof *this); };     }      // ... } 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T08:42:28+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 8:42 am

    You could always do this in your constructor:

    memset(&bflag, 0, sizeof bflag); 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a base class which contains an abstract/MustInherit method. I want this method
I have a class Matrix which contains ArrayList<ArrayList<Double>> matrix; inside, and I want to
I have a class which contains a number of fields, and all are annotated
I have a Course class which contains collection of CourseItems . Each CourseItem has
I have a class SoundManager which contains a function called 'recordLoop'. In the constructor
I have a class Foo which looks like this class Foo { public: void
I have a class that creates a List<Action<int>> and holds on to them until
I am wondering if is possible to implement following domain model. Let's have a
!Disclaimer! : Please note that I am talking about untagged declarations. I know it's
I've been using the Bindings feature with the spark view engine to replace quite

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.