Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 707107
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T04:14:26+00:00 2026-05-14T04:14:26+00:00

In C, I know I can dynamically allocate a two-dimensional array on the heap

  • 0

In C, I know I can dynamically allocate a two-dimensional array on the heap using the following code:

int** someNumbers = malloc(arrayRows*sizeof(int*));

for (i = 0; i < arrayRows; i++) {
    someNumbers[i] = malloc(arrayColumns*sizeof(int));
}

Clearly, this actually creates a one-dimensional array of pointers to a bunch of separate one-dimensional arrays of integers, and “The System” can figure out what I mean when I ask for:

someNumbers[4][2];

But when I statically declare a 2D array, as in the following line…:

int someNumbers[ARRAY_ROWS][ARRAY_COLUMNS];

…does a similar structure get created on the stack, or is it of another form completely? (i.e. is it a 1D array of pointers? If not, what is it, and how do references to it get figured out?)

Also, when I said, “The System,” what is actually responsible for figuring that out? The kernel? Or does the C compiler sort it out while compiling?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T04:14:26+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 4:14 am

    A static two-dimensional array looks like an array of arrays – it’s just laid out contiguously in memory. Arrays are not the same thing as pointers, but because you can often use them pretty much interchangeably it can get confusing sometimes. The compiler keeps track properly, though, which makes everything line up nicely. You do have to be careful with static 2D arrays like you mention, since if you try to pass one to a function taking an int ** parameter, bad things are going to happen. Here’s a quick example:

    int array1[3][2] = {{0, 1}, {2, 3}, {4, 5}};
    

    In memory looks like this:

    0 1 2 3 4 5
    

    exactly the same as:

    int array2[6] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
    

    But if you try to pass array1 to this function:

    void function1(int **a);
    

    you’ll get a warning (and the app will fail to access the array correctly):

    warning: passing argument 1 of ‘function1’ from incompatible pointer type
    

    Because a 2D array is not the same as int **. The automatic decaying of an array into a pointer only goes “one level deep” so to speak. You need to declare the function as:

    void function2(int a[][2]);
    

    or

    void function2(int a[3][2]);
    

    To make everything happy.

    This same concept extends to n-dimensional arrays. Taking advantage of this kind of funny business in your application generally only makes it harder to understand, though. So be careful out there.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 422k
  • Answers 422k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Should be: ^(.*)\((.*)\)$ This assumes no special format - it… May 15, 2026 at 11:27 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Barring typos etc, if you have a version >= 5.3.0,… May 15, 2026 at 11:27 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You declare mySortedLists to have length table.Rows.Count * table.Columns.Count, but… May 15, 2026 at 11:27 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.