Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 40039

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T14:57:38+00:00 2026-05-10T14:57:38+00:00

In C#, if you have multiple constructors, you can do something like this: public

  • 0

In C#, if you have multiple constructors, you can do something like this:

public MyClass(Guid inputId, string inputName){     // do something }  public MyClass(Guid inputId): this(inputId, 'foo') {} 

The idea is of course code reuse. However, what is the best approach when there is a bit of complex logic needed? Say I want this constructor:

public MyClass(MyOtherClass inputObject) {     Guid inputId = inputObject.ID;     MyThirdClass mc = inputObject.CreateHelper();     string inputText = mc.Text;     mc.Dispose();     // Need to call the main Constructor now with inputId and inputText  } 

The caveat here is that I need to create an object that has to be disposed after use. (Clarification: Not immediately, but I have to call Dispose() rather than waiting for Garbage Collection)

However, I did not see a way to just call the base constructor again if I add some code inside my overloaded constructor. Is there a way to call the base constructor from within an overloaded one?

Or is it possible to use

public MyClass(MyOtherClass inputObject): this(inputObject.ID,                                                inputObject.CreateHelper().Text)  {} 

Would this automatically Dispose the generated Object from CreateHelper()?

Edit: Thanks so far. Two problems: I do not control MyOtherClass and I do not have Extension Methods (only .NET 3.0…). I do control my own class though, and since I’ve just started writing it, I have no problem refactoring the constructors if there is a good approach.

  • 0 0 Answers
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T14:57:39+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 2:57 pm

    The most common pattern used to solve this problem is to have an Initialize() method that your constructors call, but in the example you just gave, adding a static method that you called like the code below, would do the trick.

    public MyClass(MyOtherClass inputObject): this(inputObject.ID, GetHelperText(inputObject) {}  private static string GetHelperText(MyOtherClass o) {    using (var helper = o.CreateHelper())       return helper.Text; } 
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 134k
  • Answers 134k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You don't need if and unless statements. As for the… May 12, 2026 at 6:44 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer What is in Emacs is a variant of Eliza, so… May 12, 2026 at 6:44 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer As far as my understanding of the SDK's page on… May 12, 2026 at 6:44 am

Related Questions

For some reason, I've always assumed that readonly fields have overhead associated with them,
In C++, if you define this function in header.hpp void incAndShow() { static int
I'm rolling my own logger class, and want to represent the heirarchy of logs
So I did not look at the right location before posting this.. I was

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.