Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7429549
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T08:59:13+00:00 2026-05-29T08:59:13+00:00

In C#, if you use Type.GetFields() with a type representing a derived class, it

  • 0

In C#, if you use Type.GetFields() with a type representing a derived class, it will return a) all explicitly declared fields in the derived class, b) all backing fields of automatic properties in the derived class and c) all explicitly declared fields in the base class.

Why are the d) backing fields of automatic properties in the base class missing?

Example:

public class Base {
    public int Foo { get; set; }
}
public class Derived : Base {
    public int Bar { get; set; }
}
class Program {
    static void Main(string[] args) {
        FieldInfo[] fieldInfos = typeof(Derived).GetFields(
            BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic |
            BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.FlattenHierarchy
        );
        foreach(FieldInfo fieldInfo in fieldInfos) {
            Console.WriteLine(fieldInfo.Name);
        }
    }
}

This will show only the backing field of Bar, not Foo.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T08:59:14+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 8:59 am

    A field being a backing field has no influence on reflection. The only relevant property of backing fields is that they are private.

    Reflection functions don’t return private members of base classes, even if you use FlattenHierarchy. You will need to loop manually over your class hierarchy and ask for private fields on each one.

    I think FlattenHierarchy is written with the intent to show all members visible to code in the class you look at. So base members can be hidden/shadowed by members with the same name in a more derived class and private members are not visible at all.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I would like to use a type which I get from a class' field
I have a program that uses enum types. enum Type{a,b,}; class A { //use
In answer to this question I tried to use Type.GetCustomAttributes(true) on a class which
Can I use type as a name for a python function argument? def fun(name,
Is there ever a reason to use Type parameters over generics, ie: // this...
I'm curious as to how often experienced Haskell programmers really use type inference in
We use custom type to represent Identifiers in our project. It has TypeConvertor attached
How can I use UIViewAnimationTransition type in one of UINavigation / TabBar transitions ?
I am use next type of strings: LPCSTR, TCHAR, String i want to convert:
Is it possible to actually use the type passed as a template for control

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.