Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 173731
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T13:23:42+00:00 2026-05-11T13:23:42+00:00

In C# I’m calling a function on an interop class ( Connection , written

  • 0

In C# I’m calling a function on an interop class (Connection, written in VB6), which itself returns a plain object (System). Then there’s a function on that object (InitialiseData) that I also call (even though the compiler isn’t aware of it).

var isInitialised = Connection.System.InitialiseData(path); 

The problem is, because that System object is returning a mere Object, I get the compile error ‘cannot resolve symbol’. I can see why, but the same thing works fine in VB.NET:

Dim isInitialised As Boolean = Connection.System.InitialiseData(path) 

Presumably VB.NET is doing something in the background that allows a kind of implicit late-binding, whereas C# does not? Is there any way to get C# to compile in a similarly ignorant way?

In fact in this case I seem to be able to work around it by casting the Object to the explicit interop type first:

var system = (QLO.System)Connection.System; var isInitialised = system.InitialiseData(path); 

But I’m still interested in answers for cases where I won’t be able to cast to a type, but still want to call functions on it. Forgive me if this is a dumb question, I’m only just starting to move from VB.NET to C#… thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T13:23:43+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:23 pm

    Late binding is coming to C# in 4.0. What you can do in the mean time is wrap the function in VB.NET and use C# to call the VB.NET method which calls the VB6 method.

    Since casting it to the proper type works in C#, does that mean that VB.NET sees the correct type and C# sees it as Object?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 196k
  • Answers 196k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer When your application terminates because of EXC_BAD_ACCESS, it's not an… May 12, 2026 at 7:12 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You need to create a subclass of SOAP::Header::SimpleHandler, as you… May 12, 2026 at 7:12 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This usually means your web server is serving the page… May 12, 2026 at 7:12 pm

Related Questions

Configuring TinyMCE to allow for tags, based on a customer requirement. My config is
in C# I'd like to invoke the label edit of a newly added item
In C I could, for example, zero out bit #10 in a 32 bit
In C# I could easily write the following: string stringValue = string.IsNullOrEmpty( otherString )
In C I know about the recursive function but I heard about the re-entrant

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.