Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6801749
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T19:08:17+00:00 2026-05-26T19:08:17+00:00

In C#: Is it possible define a method that input parameter is any method

  • 0

In C#:

Is it possible define a method that input parameter is any method?

Let me better description:

I want a method with signature

bool IsDoit(var method)
{
    try
    {
        method(...);
        return true;
    }
    catch{return false;}
}

This get a method and return a boolean that is throw exception or not!

Generic Delegate? Generic Action? Generic Func?

Do You have any idea or it is not possible?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T19:08:18+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 7:08 pm

    What would go in the “…” here? It sounds like you want a delegate of some description – and that delegate signature should match the one of the method you want to call. For example:

    static bool IsDoit(Action method)
    {
        try
        {
            method();
            return true;
        }
        catch
        {
            return false;
        }
    }
    

    That will allow method group conversions for any parameterless void method:

    if (IsDoIt(SomeMethodWithNoParameters))
    {
    }
    

    If the caller wants to call a method which takes other parameters, they can use a lambda expression to wrap it in an Action:

    if (IsDoIt(() => MethodWithParameters("first", "second"))
    {
    }
    

    Personally I’m not at all sure about the wisdom of this design in the first place, mind you – catching exceptions and swallowing them without any sort of logging seems like a really bad idea to me.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to define a base class that defines a main method that instantiates
I realize that it's possible to define a static class method as private and
Let say that I have the form below: <form action=sendMessage.php method=post> <label>Subject</label><input type=text></input> <label>Message</label><input
is it possible to define an extension method that at the same time is
Is it possible to define an instance method in ruby from a string (the
Possible Duplicate: Is it possible to define enumalpha? Is there any equivalent of Java
Is it possible to define a timestamp column in a MySQL table that will
Is it possible to define a class in C# such that class GenericCollection<T> :
In C#, using reflection, is it possible to define method in the base class
Just wondering if it is possible, by some loophole, to define a method name

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.