Question

In C++ Standard Template Library, there’s a ‘functional’ part, in which many classes have overloaded their () operator.

Does it bring any convenience to use functions as objects in C++?

Why can’t we just use function pointer instead? Any examples?

Answer 1

Ofcourse, One can always use Function pointers instead of Function Objects, However there are certain advantages which function objects provide over function pointers, namely:

• Better Performance:

One of the most distinct and important advantage is they are more likely to yield better performance. In case of function objects more details are available at compile time so that the compiler can accurately determine and hence inline the function to be called unlike in case of function pointers where the derefencing of the pointer makes it difficult for the compiler to determine the actual function that will be called.

• Function objects are Smart functions:

Function objects may have other member functions and attributes.This means that function objects have a state. In fact, the same function, represented by a function object, may have different states at the same time. This is not possible for ordinary functions. Another advantage of function objects is that you can initialize them at runtime before you use/call them.

• Power of Generic programming:

Ordinary functions can have different types only when their signatures differ. However, function objects can have different types even when their signatures are the same. In fact, each functional behavior defined by a function object has its own type. This is a significant improvement for generic programming using templates because one can pass functional behavior as a template parameter.