Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4086540
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 20, 20262026-05-20T18:44:26+00:00 2026-05-20T18:44:26+00:00

In C++ we use delete operator to delete objects most of the time. The

  • 0

In C++ we use delete operator to delete objects most of the time.

The delete doesn’t make pointer value NULL. Is there any way this can be achieved automatically?

e.g.

int *p = new int;
delete p;  // this should deallocate object pointed by p
           // and also initialized value of p = NULL
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-20T18:44:27+00:00Added an answer on May 20, 2026 at 6:44 pm

    It is simple to write one like this:

    template<class T>
    void safe_delete(T*& p)
    {
        delete p;
        p = NULL;
    }
    int main()
    {
        int* p = new int;
        safe_delete(p);
    
        double* p1 = new double;
        safe_delete(p1);
    
    }
    

    Be careful not to use this with arrays though 🙂

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is this the right way to use delete[] operator? int* a=new int[size]; delete[] a;
I'm trying to use ON CASCADE DELETE in mysql db but I can't make
My question is why we use delete operators for our objects? Does not .net
Twitter has deprecated the use of all methods that use DELETE as a request
When using java.jdbc in clojure is it possible to use delete-rows with a complex
When I use new [] to apply memory. In the end, I use delete
How do i get expressjs to use the delete and put methods for form?
In our build , we use to delete our view and create new view
How does one use rm to delete a file named '--help'? When I try,
In MySQL you can use the syntax DELETE t1,t2 FROM table1 AS t1 INNER

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.