Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8414343
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T01:08:41+00:00 2026-06-10T01:08:41+00:00

In C#, you can define a const string , but not an array as

  • 0

In C#, you can define a const string, but not an array as arrays are objects. It is to my understanding that strings are in fact objects as they are reference objects passed by value just like arrays.

So how is it that we can do this:

const string NewLine = "\r\n";

but not this:

const byte[] AesSwapBytes = new byte[] { ... };

Is it because we can’t change individual characters on strings (NewLine[0] = '\n'), but can on arrays (arr[0] = i)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T01:08:43+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 1:08 am

    Whether or not you can make a variable has nothing to do with whether it’s an object, or a struct. What is required to make a variable const is that the right hand size of the assignment must be a compile time literal. There are only a handful of types that have compile time literals. string is one, as is int, double, and the other numeric types. As was mentioned in another answer, null is a compile time literal, so if you really wanted to you could assign any nullable type to be const and assign null to it (not that it would really be useful). If C# were to add compile time literals (other than null) that resulted in arrays then you could create a meaningful const array. Until then, you’ll be stuck using some other mechanisms to do what you want.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I know I can define default parameters in python, but can I do so
I know that one can define an 'expected' exception in JUnit, doing: @Test(expect=MyException.class) public
In C# you can define delegates anonymously (even though they are nothing more than
In core.php I can define Configure::write('Routing.admin', 'admin'); and /admin/controller/index will work. but if I
I want to force subclasses to define a constant value. Like const string SomeConstantEverySubclassMustDefine
I've defined a few macros that make it simpler to define an array of
Possible Duplicate: Modifying C string constants? Pointer to const char vs char array vs
I know that, in theory, you can not (and should not) derive static classes
I can define default value in domain by this way : class ProcessingPriority {
I can define church numerals fairly easy using scheme: > (define f (lambda (x)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.