Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1060575
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T18:20:51+00:00 2026-05-16T18:20:51+00:00

In C99 there are variable-length arrays, and there can be static qualifiers (and type

  • 0

In C99 there are variable-length arrays, and there can be static qualifiers (and type qualifiers) in parameter array declarators:

void f(int i, int *a);
void f(int i, int a[]);
void f(int i, int a[i]);
void f(int i, int a[*]);         // Only allowed in function prototypes.
void f(int i, int a[static i]);

Since array function parameters simply decay to pointers, is there any practical difference between the previous declarations, or is it a matter of style? When should any of them be used? In particular, what does the static qualifier imply? The standard does not render well clear the reason for each syntax.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T18:20:51+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 6:20 pm

    As long as you are working with single-dimensional arrays only, the above declarations are all equivalent. The last one though

    void f(int i, int a[static i])
    

    has an extra effect. It is equivalent to the previous ones in terms of the parameter types, but also tells the compiler that it can rely on a parameter pointing to an array of at least i elements (which can be used in optimizations).

    You are also forgetting another new declaration

    void f(int i, int a[const])
    

    This one actually does have an effect even in case of a single-dimensional array. It is equivalent to

    void f(int i, int *const a)
    

    although some might argue that const-qualifications on function parameters are useless. Before it was impossible to const-qualify the pointer the array parameter “decays” to when using the [] syntax for the declaration.

    The * (as well as i) between the [] begins to matter only when it is used between the second (or greater) pair of [] in multi-dimensional array declaration. In essence, it is just like it has always been: array size in the parameter declaration always mattered only between the second or further pair of []. The * is used in prototype declarations for VLA parameters, when the size value is not named explicitly. For example, you can declare

    void bar(int n, int m, int a[n][m]);
    

    and the compiler will know that a is a VLA since the sizes are not constants. But if you prefer not to name parameters in prototypes, how are you going to tell the compiler that a is a VLA? That’s when * helps

    void bar(int, int, int a[*][*]);
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.