Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 510063
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T07:04:30+00:00 2026-05-13T07:04:30+00:00

In case of BackgroundWorker , a cancel can be reported by the e.Cancel –

  • 0

In case of BackgroundWorker, a cancel can be reported by the e.Cancel – property of the DoWork – event handler.

How can I achieve the same thing with a Thread object?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T07:04:30+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 7:04 am

    Here is a full example of one way of doing it.

    private static bool _runThread;
    private static object _runThreadLock = new object();
    
    private static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        _runThread = true;
        Thread t = new Thread(() =>
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Starting thread...");
            bool _localRunThread = true;
            while (_localRunThread)
            {
                Console.WriteLine("Working...");
                Thread.Sleep(1000);
                lock (_runThreadLock)
                {
                    _localRunThread = _runThread;
                }
            }
            Console.WriteLine("Exiting thread...");
        });
        t.Start();
    
        // wait for any key press, and then exit the app
        Console.ReadKey();
    
        // tell the thread to stop
        lock (_runThreadLock)
        {
            _runThread = false;
        }
    
        // wait for the thread to finish
        t.Join();
    
        Console.WriteLine("All done.");    
    }
    

    In short; the thread checks a bool flag, and keeps runing as long as the flag is true. I prefer this approach over calling Thread.Abort becuase it seems a bit nicer and cleaner.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm creating an array of BackgroundWorker that shares one event handler like this: BackgroundWorker[]
For instance, a thread that is a BackgroundWorker, can be cast like: private void
Given the code: new Thread(new BackgroundWorker()).start(); Intuitively it feels like the BackgroundWorker instance should
How do I get results from the BackgroundWorker in this case? I'm also open
I'm playing with the .NET BackgroundWorker class. As part of its functionality you can
I am using 5 BackgroundWorker objects running at the same time for a certain
I need to cancel a background task started using ThreadPool.QueueUserWorkItem(...). I know a BackgroundWorker
Case 1: -(id)getAnObject{ Object *someObject = [[Object alloc] init]; //doing something return someObject; }
We have a business case that would be perfect for multiple BackgroundWorkers. As an
Case : I'm creating a desktop application with VB.NET (Windows Forms), and using SQL

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.