Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 951979
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T23:49:15+00:00 2026-05-15T23:49:15+00:00

In chapter 15 of Real World Haskell, a type class is defined: class (Monad

  • 0

In chapter 15 of Real World Haskell, a type class is defined:

class (Monad m) => MonadSupply s m | m -> s where

A couple paragraphs later, it says that >>= and return don’t need to be defined because of the context. But there’s no further explanation of what it means by context.

How does the compiler know MonadSupply is an instance of Monad if only ‘m’ is an instance of Monad?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T23:49:16+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:49 pm

    The “context” is just the part between class and =>, which in this case is the constraint Monad m. And it’s not so much that it “knows”, more that it enforces it–writing an instance of MonadSupply for a type m that doesn’t also have a Monad instance will produce a compiler error.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm reading the Monads chapter in Real World Haskell (chapter 14). A function is
I'm on the I/O chapter of Real World Haskell. Monads aren't discussed in the
So I'm working through some initial chapter exercise of Real World Haskell and I
I'm working through Real World Haskell one of the exercises of chapter 4 is
I almost finish the chapter 3 of Real World Haskell. The last exercise blocks
I am reading the real world haskell Chapter 9. There is a maybeIO function
I'm following Real World Haskell, and am going through chapter 2, where the exercise
Following the excercises in chapter 5 of Real World Haskell, I end up with
[This question is motivated by Chapter 9 in Real World Haskell] Here's a simple
I'm working my way through Real World Haskell (I'm in chapter 4) and to

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.