Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6064545
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T09:17:32+00:00 2026-05-23T09:17:32+00:00

In class initialization feature , which allows to initialize normal members inside the class

  • 0

In class initialization feature, which allows to initialize normal members inside the class itself,

struct A {
  int a = 0; // error: ISO C++ forbids in-class initialization of non-const static member ‘a’
};

This is giving error in latest compiler gcc-4.6 (with -std=c++0x). Has this feature made into the C++11 standard or gcc still doesn’t support it ?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T09:17:32+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:17 am

    Yes, that is legal in C++0x. There is an example of this at N3290 §12.6.2/8:

    struct C {
        /* ... */
        int j = 5; // OK: j has the value 5
    };
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I created a class which allows access to global access to a variable while
I've a question about initialization of inherited members in constructor of derived class. Example
I posted a question recently: Initialization of Static Class members. Now please check this
I have an initialization class that preloads content into a variable (probably a list
class someclass {}; class base { int a; int *pint; someclass objsomeclass; someclass* psomeclass;
What's a good existing class/design pattern for multi-stage construction/initialization of an object in C++?
I have a simple class which has a static constructor and a instance constructor.
I have a class which has a constructor that takes a const char* .
For static member variables in C++ class - the initialization is done outside the
Watch the following example: class A { public: A(int param1, int param2, int param3)

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.