Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7783661
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T19:54:14+00:00 2026-06-01T19:54:14+00:00

In coffee script, using the existential operator on a function like so: myFunc?() compiles

  • 0

In coffee script, using the existential operator on a function like so:

myFunc?()

compiles to

typeof myFunc === "function" ? myFunc() : void 0;

Is there a way to elegantly define what would go in place of “void 0”? or must I write it all out instead of using the original notation?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T19:54:15+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 7:54 pm

    You can add another existential operator:

    x = f?() ? 'pancakes'
    

    That won’t work if f() returns null or undefined but it will do the Right Thing if f() returns false. For example:

    f = 'not a function'
    console.log f?() ? 'pancakes'
    # pancakes
    
    f = -> 'is a function'
    console.log f?() ? 'pancakes'
    # is a function
    
    f = -> null
    console.log f?() ? 'pancakes'
    # pancakes
    
    f = ->
    console.log f?() ? 'pancakes'
    # pancakes
    
    f = -> false
    console.log f?() ? 'pancakes'
    # false
    

    Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/f6yvN/1/

    So you can get close to what you want and that might be close enough depending on what sort of things you’re expecting the function to return.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I was looking through some compiled coffee-script code, and I noticed something like the
I'm using 'coffee-script` npm package: var coffee = require('coffee-script'); var source = coffee.compile('target.js'); and
Couldn't manage chaining calls using coffee script. I'm trying to reproduce this in coffee
for coffee script in visual studio currently I'm using this plugin. But on relatively
I have an Ant project that uses a bit of Coffee Script. I would
I would like to create visualizations using Protovis, but writing in CoffeeScript rather than
I'm using the Raphaël Javascript lib (awesome stuff for SVG rendering, by the way)
I'm trying to install coffee script on ubuntu 10.04. It hangs forever. This is
It's easy to use coffee-haml-filter within Rails. Under Rails 2, run script/plugin install git://github.com/gerad/coffee-haml-filter.git
In bash, is there a way to chain multiple commands, all taking the same

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.