Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8779491
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T19:48:02+00:00 2026-06-13T19:48:02+00:00

In Concurrency in Practice , it says you can use volatile variables if Writes

  • 0

In Concurrency in Practice, it says you can use volatile variables if

Writes to the variable do not depend on its current value.

So, if you have a shared, mutable variable a, and all threads ever do to it is go a++ (they don’t get the value, they just ++).

Then according to the quote, you should be able to make it volatile even though a++ is not atomic, correct?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T19:48:03+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 7:48 pm

    No, using ++ on a volatile variable is not threadsafe, because

    a++
    

    is equivalent to:

    int temp = a;
    temp = temp + 1;
    a = temp;
    

    So the write back to a may happen after another thread has modified a since your thread read it, so a++, even if a is volatile, is not threadsafe.

    You can use AtomicInteger, which implements threadsafe atomic incrementation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

From book Java Concurrency in Practice page 26: You can use volatile variables only
Goetz's Java Concurrency in Practice , page 41, mentions how this reference can escape
I have read Java Concurrency in Practice and this is a great reference, but
According to Brian Goetz's Java Concurrency in Practice JVM can't exit until all the
I am reading the book Java Concurrency in Practice where it says, CyclicBarrier allows
In the famous Java Concurrency in Practice, section 2.4, it says that intrinsic locking
I have implemented custom cancellation logic as described in Concurrency in Practice. Encapsulating nonstandard
In the book Java Concurrency in Practice , Brian Goetz says that objects passed
Reading Java Concurrency In Practice, there's this part in section 3.5: public Holder holder;
I am reading Java Concurrency in practice and looking at the example code on

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.