Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8092529
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T20:18:14+00:00 2026-06-05T20:18:14+00:00

In CSS3 font-face , there are multiple font types included like ttf , eot

  • 0

In CSS3 font-face, there are multiple font types included like ttf, eot, woff, svg and cff.

Why should we use all of these types?

If they are special to different browsers, why is the number of them greater than the number of the major web browsers?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T20:18:16+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 8:18 pm

    Answer in 2019:

    Only use WOFF2, or if you need legacy support, WOFF. Do not use any other format

    (svg and eot are dead formats, ttf and otf are full system fonts, and should not be used for web purposes)

    Original answer from 2012:

    In short, font-face is very old, but only recently has been supported by more than IE.

    • eot is needed for Internet Explorers that are older than IE9 – they invented the spec, but eot was a proprietary solution.

    • ttf and otf are normal old fonts, so some people got annoyed that this meant anyone could download expensive-to-license fonts for free.

    • Time passes, SVG 1.1 adds a “fonts” chapter that explains how to model a font purely using SVG markup, and people start to use it. More time passes and it turns out that they are absolutely terrible compared to just a normal font format, and SVG 2 wisely removes the entire chapter again.

    • Then, woff gets invented by people with quite a bit of domain knowledge, which makes it possible to host fonts in a way that throws away bits that are critically important for system installation, but irrelevant for the web (making people worried about piracy happy) and allows for internal compression to better suit the needs of the web (making users and hosts happy). This becomes the preferred format.

    • 2019 edit A few years later, woff2 gets drafted and accepted, which improves the compression, leading to even smaller files, along with the ability to load a single font “in parts” so that a font that supports 20 scripts can be stored as “chunks” on disk instead, with browsers automatically able to load the font “in parts” as needed, rather than needing to transfer the entire font up front, further improving the typesetting experience.

    If you don’t want to support IE 8 and lower, and iOS 4 and lower, and android 4.3 or earlier, then you can just use WOFF (and WOFF2, a more highly compressed WOFF, for the newest browsers that support it.)

    @font-face {
      font-family: 'MyWebFont';
      src:  url('myfont.woff2') format('woff2'),
            url('myfont.woff') format('woff');
    }
    

    Support for woff can be checked at http://caniuse.com/woff
    Support for woff2 can be checked at http://caniuse.com/woff2

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

i'm just trying out the new font-face feature in css3 for implementing own ttf/otf
The introduction of @font-face in CSS3 allows web designers to use fonts that look
I have a problem with CSS3 property for using my own fonts @font-face. In
I understand that css3.0 supports the Font-Face tag, correctly in the latest Opera, Safari,
The CSS3 @font-face rule breaks a Razor section with the error message: CS0103: The
I use @font-face in my .css styles sheet and it works fine for chrome
I'm using CSS3 @font-face for web fonts, page looks fine in Firefox and IE
Will I have copyright problems with Microsoft if I add the @font-face CSS3 property
As far as I know that embedding font face is only possible with CSS3
No, like others, I don't want to use custom fonts. I am looking for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.