Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
In David Fowler’s blog, SQL Server has been added to the list of scale out providers for service bus.
I am in the process of implementing Redis on our Windows servers. Based on what I know about Redis, I’m guessing it will be significantly faster than using SQL Server – is that a fair assumption?
If so, how does the Windows version of Redis implement fail-over?
It will be faster than SQL Server since it’s optimized for in-memory based operations, however its speed isn’t the only advantage. Support of advanced data structures offers a great deal of flexibility when dealing with various scenarios.
There is a link in download section to unofficial windows based port of redis which however isn’t meant to be used for production purpose. Official version of redis supports replication and sentinel has automatic failover, but it’s hard to say what’s the state of these features in windows port. In general I wouldn’t recommend to use redis on windows machine but rather use virtual machine with linux distro and run it there.