Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3226252
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T16:26:02+00:00 2026-05-17T16:26:02+00:00

In Effective C++ (3rd edition), Scott Meyers, in Item 31, suggests that classes should

  • 0

In Effective C++ (3rd edition), Scott Meyers, in Item 31, suggests that classes should have, on top of their classic Declaration (.h) and Definition (.cpp) files, a Forward Declaration Include File (fwd.h), which class that do not need the full definition can use, instead of forward declaring themselves.

I somewhat see the case for it, but I really don’t see this as a viable option… It seems very hard to maintain, rather overkill and hardly necessary.

I can, however, see its use for template forward declarations, which are rather heavy. But for simple classes? It seems to be that it’s a pain to maintain and will create a whole lot of almost empty include files that serve a very small purpose… is it worth the hassle?

Here’s a example:

// Class.h
class Class
{
    Class();
    ~Class();
};

// ClassFwd.h
class Class;

// Class.cpp
Class::Class()
{
}

Class::~Class()
{
}

My question:

What do you guys think? If this a good practice?

NOTE I am mostly interested in the arguments FOR this practice, to see if I missed something that would make me agree with Scott Meyers.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T16:26:03+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 4:26 pm

    I used forward declaration header files for all my libraries. A library would typically have this structure:

    lib/
      include/
        class headers + Fwd.h
    src/
      source files + internal headers
    

    The lib/include directory would contain all public classes headers along with one forward declarations header. This made the library light-weight on the include side. Any header outside of this library only includes the forward header (Fwd.h), while sources outside of this library includes the necessary complete headers. One can also provide a convenience header (Lib.h) that includes all the other headers, for use in source files.

    Another thing to place in the forward declaration header is typedefs for shared_ptr, especially in the case of an inheritance hierarchy with factory classes that return pointers to implementations.

    The above is useful for larger applications with lots of internal libraries. A refinement of the above for this case would be to place the public headers in lib/include/lib. This way clients of your library would have to include lib/.... Think of this as a namespace for your headers.

    Good luck!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Scott said on Effective C++, 3rd Edition, pg. 43 that to make an abstract
According to Scott Meyers, in his Effective STL book - item 46. He claimed
From Effective Java Second Edition, Item 28 : Do not use wildcard types as
While going through Effective C++ (by Scott Meyers), I came across the following code
Effective Java , along with other sources suggest that we should consider using composition
In Effective STL tip 16, it says that we should avoid to pass iterator
Both Marshall Clines' C++ FAQ Lite and Scott Meyers' Effective C++ suggest using functions
From Effective Java Item 18 where it suggests we can combine interfaces and abstract
Effective Java (Second Edition) , Item 4, discusses using private constructors to enforce noninstantiability.
I have an application that connects to a 3rd party. They fire web-hooks simultaneously

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.