Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 701171
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T03:34:48+00:00 2026-05-14T03:34:48+00:00

In F# the syntax sugar hides the CLR implementation, why not in C# 4.0?

  • 0

In F# the syntax sugar hides the CLR implementation, why not in C# 4.0?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T03:34:48+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 3:34 am

    UPDATE: This answer was written over a decade ago. A syntax for tuples was added to C# 7.0.


    We considered adding a syntactic sugar for tuples. I think everyone agrees that it’s a nice feature, but it simply didn’t fit into the budget.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Why it's a syntax error: my @hash{1..4}=(1..4); but not this one: my %hash; @hash{1..4}=(1..4);
I'm familiar with this new syntax sugar: public string Name { get; set; }
I was just wondering if C# / WPF had a ''syntax sugar-ed'' variant for
Are scopes just syntax sugar, or is there any real advantage in using them
Beautiful syntax sugar helps in understanding a language.
C# unfortunately does not allow for extra user-defined syntax. But I was wondering whether
Has anyone tried new syntax sugar introduced in Xcode 4.4 (iOS 5.1), like automatically
I have a question regarding SQL syntax and whether or not a particular action
syntax error: msg = keyword can't be an expression offset = None print_file_and_line =
Ruby syntax reference says about case statements: Comparisons are done by operator === infact,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.