Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 547327
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T10:57:41+00:00 2026-05-13T10:57:41+00:00

In general, it’s better to do a single query vs. many queries for a

  • 0

In general, it’s better to do a single query vs. many queries for a given object. Let’s say I have a bunch of ‘son’ objects each with a ‘father’. I get all the ‘son’ objects:

sons = Son.all()

Then, I’d like to get all the fathers for that group of sons. I do:

father_keys = {}
for son in sons:
    father_keys.setdefault(son.father.key(), None)

Then I can do:

fathers = Father.get(father_keys.keys())

Now, this assumes that son.father.key() doesn’t actually go fetch the object. Am I wrong on this? I have a bunch of code that assumes the object.related_object.key() doesn’t actually fetch related_object from the datastore.

Am I doing this right?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T10:57:42+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:57 am

    You can find the answer by studying the sources of appengine.ext.db in your download of the App Engine SDK sources — and the answer is, no, there’s no special-casing as you require: the __get__ method (line 2887 in the sources for the 1.3.0 SDK) of the ReferenceProperty descriptor gets invoked before knowing if .key() or anything else will later be invoked on the result, so it just doesn’t get a chance to do the optimization you’d like.

    However, see line 2929: method get_value_for_datastore does do exactly what you want!

    Specifically, instead of son.father.key(), use Son.father.get_value_for_datastore(son) and you should be much happier as a result;-).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

A general architecture question in Sitecore 6... Let’s say we have a situation where
In general, as for as objects, java reclaims the memory occupied by the object
In general, I occasionally have a chain of nested macros with a few preprocessor
The general problem: We have urls coming to our IIS web servers formatted like:
In general, is it a best practice to have simple POJO Java classes implement
I have a JSP page retrieving data and when single or double quotes are
General Info: ASP.NET MVC app using ADO.NET Entity Framework SQL Server 2005 I have
General Confusion I have bands which can have 3 genres. I read in a
General case: first table represents one -side, second table represents many -side. Third table
General context : MVVM application. I have a View called JobView. Its DataContext is

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.