Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 362203
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T13:13:19+00:00 2026-05-12T13:13:19+00:00

In general, which is more expensive? A double-nested for loop and one call to

  • 0

In general, which is more expensive? A double-nested for loop and one call to a database or a call to a database for each of N items in only one for loop?

Not looking for an answer down to microseconds, just a general idea of which direction I should take.

TIA.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T13:13:20+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 1:13 pm

    In general, the fewer times you hit the database, the better. There are a number of reasons for this, including:

    • The database will be able to optimize better if it can try to fetch everything all at once
    • You remove all of the overhead of communicating with the database multiple times, which can be quite significant
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

For general protocol message exchange, which can tolerate some packet loss. How much more
This is more of a general question i suppose... I am looking to start
When desinging UI for mobile apps in general which resolution could be considered safe
Which is better in general in terms of the ordering? Do you put the
In general I'd like to understand which templates to use when, when I'm making
In general, which performs better? How are they like when processing vector graphics?
I have to give a general note to some huge Java project for which
Is there a collation type which is officially recommended by MySQL, for a general
General Follow the same standards for all tests. Be clear about what each test
I am new to Blackberry development.My application contain five list items having strings each

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.