Home/ Questions/Q 8847711
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-06-14T12:15:19+00:00

In had a rather large error in my previous question select earliest date from

  • 0

In had a rather large error in my previous question

select earliest date from multiple rows

The answer by horse_with_no_name returns a perfect result, and I am hugely appreciative, however I got my own initial question wrong so I really apologise; if you look at the table below;

circuit_uid  |customer_name     |rack_location  |reading_date   | reading_time | amps | volts  |  kw  | kwh | kva  |  pf  |  key 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cu1.cb1.r1    | Customer 1       | 12.01.a1      | 2012-01-02   | 00:01:01     | 4.51 | 229.32 | 1.03 |  87 | 1.03 | 0.85 |    15
cu1.cb1.r1    | Customer 1       | 12.01.a1      | 2012-01-02   | 01:01:01     | 4.18 | 230.3  | 0.96 |  90 | 0.96 | 0.84 |    16
cu1.cb1.r2    | Customer 1       | 12.01.a1      | 2012-01-02   | 00:01:01     | 4.51 | 229.32 | 1.03 |  21 | 1.03 | 0.85 |    15
cu1.cb1.r2    | Customer 1       | 12.01.a1      | 2012-01-02   | 01:01:01     | 4.18 | 230.3  | 0.96 |  23 | 0.96 | 0.84 |    16
cu1.cb1.s2    | Customer 2       | 10.01.a1      | 2012-01-02   | 00:01:01     | 7.34 | 228.14 | 1.67 | 179 | 1.67 | 0.88 | 24009
cu1.cb1.s2    | Customer 2       | 10.01.a1      | 2012-01-02   | 01:01:01     | 9.07 |  228.4 | 2.07 | 182 | 2.07 | 0.85 | 24010
cu1.cb1.s3    | Customer 2       | 10.01.a1      | 2012-01-02   | 00:01:01     | 7.34 | 228.14 | 1.67 | 121 | 1.67 | 0.88 | 24009
cu1.cb1.s3    | Customer 2       | 10.01.a1      | 2012-01-02   | 01:01:01     | 9.07 |  228.4 | 2.07 | 124 | 2.07 | 0.85 | 24010
cu1.cb1.r1    | Customer 3       | 01.01.a1      | 2012-01-02   | 00:01:01     | 7.32 | 229.01 | 1.68 | 223 | 1.68 | 0.89 | 48003 
cu1.cb1.r1    | Customer 3       | 01.01.a1      | 2012-01-02   | 01:01:01     | 6.61 | 228.29 | 1.51 | 226 | 1.51 | 0.88 | 48004
cu1.cb1.r4    | Customer 3       | 01.01.a1      | 2012-01-02   | 00:01:01     | 7.32 | 229.01 | 1.68 | 215 | 1.68 | 0.89 | 48003 
cu1.cb1.r4    | Customer 3       | 01.01.a1      | 2012-01-02   | 01:01:01     | 6.61 | 228.29 | 1.51 | 217 | 1.51 | 0.88 | 48004

As you can see each customer now has multiple circuits. So the result would now be the sum of each of the earliest kwh readings for each circuit per customer, so the result in this table would be;

customer_name | kwh(sum)
--------------+-----------
customer 1    | 108      (the result of 87 + 21)  
customer 2    | 300      (the result of 179 + 121)  
customer 3    | 438      (the result of 223 + 215)

There will be more than 2 circuits per customer and the readings can happen at varying times, hence the need for the ‘earliest’ reading.

Would anybody have any suggestions for the revised question?

PostgreSQL 8.4 on CentOs/Redhat.

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team
    SELECT customer_name, sum(kwh) AS kwh_total
FROM  (
    SELECT DISTINCT ON (customer_name, circuit_uid)
           customer_name, circuit_uid, kwh
    FROM   readings
    WHERE  reading_date = '2012-01-02'::date
    ORDER  BY customer_name, circuit_uid, reading_time
    ) x
GROUP  BY 1

    Same as before, just pick the earliest per (customer_name, circuit_uid).
    Then sum per customer_name.

    Index

    A multi-column index like the following will make this very fast:

    CREATE INDEX readings_multi_idx
ON readings(reading_date, customer_name, circuit_uid, reading_time);
    • 0