Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7636115
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T07:35:28+00:00 2026-05-31T07:35:28+00:00

In Haskell, I can easily map a list: map (\x -> 2*x) [1,2] gives

  • 0

In Haskell, I can easily map a list:

map (\x -> 2*x) [1,2]

gives me [2,4]. Is there any “mapTuple” function which would work like that?

mapTuple (\x -> 2*x) (1,2)

with the result being (2,4).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T07:35:30+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 7:35 am

    Searching at Hoogle gives no exact matches for (a -> b) -> (a, a) -> (b, b), which is the type you require, but it is pretty easy to do yourself:

    mapTuple :: (a -> b) -> (a, a) -> (b, b)
    mapTuple f (a1, a2) = (f a1, f a2)
    

    Note, you will have to define a new function for 3-tuples, 4-tuples etc – although such a need might be a sign, that you are not using tuples like they were intended: In general, tuples hold values of different types, so wanting to apply a single function to all values is not very common.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there some Haskell function that can take a list, say of doubles, like
I would like to know if there is any possibility that I can use
In Haskell I can easily define a recursive function which takes a value and
I am trying to write haskell function that takes list of lists and find
How can I write a function in Haskell, that takes an input string in
I have a Haskell function which reports a long error message. Although I can
Can 2 or more equations defining a function in Haskell share the same where
In Haskell, how can I generate Fibonacci numbers based on the property that the
Haskell provides the feature something like f = f1 . f2 How can I
When I open a file for reading in Haskell, I've found that I can't

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.