Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8224905
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 7, 20262026-06-07T15:13:57+00:00 2026-06-07T15:13:57+00:00

In Java code, I think this: for (int i = 0; i < s.length();

  • 0

In Java code, I think this:

for (int i = 0; i < s.length(); i++) {
    // do a lot of something
}

Is slower than this:

int length = s.length();
for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) {
    // do a lot of something
}

Please tell me whether I’m correct.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-07T15:13:58+00:00Added an answer on June 7, 2026 at 3:13 pm

    In theory the first code sample could be slower because it calls s.length() once per iteration. But it’s possible that the JVM will optimize the first piece of code for you. Use the simpler approach unless benchmarks show that:

    1. You are in a performance critical piece of code.
    2. Storing the length in the local variable actually does give a speed up.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have this Java code, and I want to do the same thing in
I have some code which I think should compile, but doesn't: import java.io.InputStream; import
This Java code compiles fine, but when I try to run it I get:
I recently start studying JAVA, and I find this code: public class Dublicate{ public
I found this piece of Java code at Wikipedia that is supposed to shuffle
Newbie Scala Question: Say I want to do this [Java code] in Scala: public
A really weird thing happens in this code JNIEXPORT jintArray JNICALL Java_jsdr_SdrLibrary_getTunerGains (JNIEnv *
Will Java code built and compiled against a 32-bit JDK into 32-bit byte code
IN JAVA CODE IN JSP as below i m getting null value for fieldnoOfRecords.
My Java code must get string HH:MM from console and needs to operate with

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.