Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6984579
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T18:34:03+00:00 2026-05-27T18:34:03+00:00

In Java Concurrency In Practice book (p.156), there’s a statement regarding poison pill approach:

  • 0

In Java Concurrency In Practice book (p.156), there’s a statement regarding poison pill approach:

Poison pills work reliably only with unbound queues.

Does it mean that with a bounded queue I can get a deadlock, or is it about some other liveness problems?
Is it connected with number of producers and customers?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T18:34:03+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:34 pm

    With a bounded queue, you could be prevented from adding the poison pill.

    One way to avoid this issue is to make the bounded queue allow one more when a poison pill is added.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Reading Java Concurrency In Practice, there's this part in section 3.5: public Holder holder;
I found the book Java Concurrency in Practice to be an excellent guide to
I'm reading the Book Java Concurrency in Practice . In chapter 15, they are
In Java Concurrency in Practice there is a sample that made me confused: public
I am reading this book called Java Concurrency in Practice and the author gives
So I am reading this book titled Java Concurrency in Practice and I am
I'm studying Java Concurrency in Practice and there it is explained why the following
In Brian Goetz's book, Java Concurrency in Practice, his example of a Reentrant lock
Code from the book Java Concurrency in Practice Listing 8.1 Why is the code
In the book Java Concurrency In Practice it explains the advantages of effectively immutable

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.