Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7656515
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 31, 20262026-05-31T12:46:59+00:00 2026-05-31T12:46:59+00:00

In Java when a final field is assigned a constant value compile-time, it usually

  • 0

In Java when a final field is assigned a constant value compile-time, it usually makes sense declaring it static. It saves overhead according to the relevant PMD rule.

Does it make any sense or difference doing it in GWT regarding the generated Javascript code?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-31T12:47:01+00:00Added an answer on May 31, 2026 at 12:47 pm

    If the variable is assigned when it is declared final, then yes, static makes a certain amount of sense, but there are cases where it should not be static:

    public MyClassWithFinal {
        private final String finalVar;
        public MyClassWithFinal(String name) {
             this.finalVar = name;
        }
    }
    

    Another case: If the instance var is not a string or number constant, but requires running a constructor, that constructor may have side effects each time it is invoked, so running it only once is different than running it multiple times.

    That said, GWT will inline/intern constant string values, so if you have multiple String fields all assigned to the same value, GWT will probably detect that and promote them all to static.

    public final String constant = "Some Constant that really ought to be static";
    

    GWT will notice that this is never assigned except when declared, and may even remove the field itself.

    The best rule is to start with the best (i.e. most readable, most maintainable, most efficient) Java code, and to only break from that in cases where GWT requires something specific. This is not one of those cases: the compiler should perform the same basic optimizations no matter how you write this.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm trying to change a private static final field with Java Reflection. But it
In Java, static final variables are constants and the convention is that they should
Why won't Java let me assign a value to a final variable in a
I have a class with a private static final field that, unfortunately, I need
A final field has to be initialized only once in Java by convention. No
on JLS 3, 17.5 Final Field Semantics's second discussion part: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/memory.html#17.5 It is said
DZone refcard titled Core Java Concurrency states: Once set, final field values cannot be
I tried to modify private final static variable like this : ...try { Field
Consider the following class written in Java: class NonNegativeDouble { private final double value;
The Java Memory Model (since 1.5) treats final fields differently to non- final fields.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.