Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7907141
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T11:17:22+00:00 2026-06-03T11:17:22+00:00

In libstdc++, <iostream> header defines an instance of ios_base::Init , whose constructor atomicly increase

  • 0

In libstdc++, <iostream> header defines an instance of ios_base::Init, whose constructor atomicly increase a counter and initialize cin/cout/cerr if the counter is 0. This guarantees that cin/cout/cerr is always initialized after #include <iostream>, in every TU.

I want to implement an initializer with same behavior as ios_base::Init, i.e. I want to guarantee some of my global objects is initialized as soon as I include some header, before it gets used in constructor of another global variable. However, this needs to use atomic operation. libstdc++ uses GCC’s extension, which is not standard: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/src/c%2B%2B98/ios_init.cc?view=markup

According to How to use std::atomic efficiently, std::atomic is the only standard way to do atomic operation, so I need to a global atomic variable constructed before the initializer in all TU. To initialize it, I need another initializer that initialize it, and so on so forth, sadly, go to some infinite recursion.

So my question is, what is the best, standard way to do it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T11:17:23+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 11:17 am

    The standard atomic variables have constant-expression constructors, which means that they are initialized during the static initialization phase (i.e. at compile time). Thus there is no problem using something like an std::atomic<int> as your counter.

    That said, if your program doesn’t launch any threads before main starts, you probably don’t have to worry too much about this anyway.

    By the way, the construction you describe is also known as the nifty counter or Schwarz counter.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm attempting to build a binary package that can be run on multiple Linux
i have recently compiled new clang(3.1 now), and tried to use it for parsing
What does this option to ld mean? -lrt I know to some degree it
After I installed Aptana (install directory: /usr/share/aptana ) I keep getting errors like this:
A simple question - is there any way to make the g++ linker to
I am trying to debug a problem with an application on Linux. It tends

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.