Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 843541
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T06:08:43+00:00 2026-05-15T06:08:43+00:00

In looking at the source for the KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> struct, the private member fields

  • 0

In looking at the source for the KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> struct, the private member fields are only ever written to by the constructor. Is there a design consideration of some sort as to why these are not marked readonly?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T06:08:44+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 6:08 am

    I do not believe there was any explicit design decision here. It was almost certainly an oversight by the original author of the code.

    Also at the time of this types’ authoring, the use of readonly was a bit controversial for this scenario. A significant number of people felt it was bad practice to use readonly on a non-immutable field. So much so that an FxCop rule was added to enforce this practice (CA2104). The type author could simply played by the rules of the time.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just looking at: (Source: https://xkcd.com/327/ ) What does this SQL do: Robert'); DROP TABLE
I'm looking at source code from Funambol, but the dependencies are so huge, I'm
I am looking for open source or free data collaboration software. Specifically this is
I was looking at the source code of java.uti.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer and the acquire() method looks
I am just looking at the source code of BlogEngine.Net and was intrigued at
Am looking for C# open source NMEA parser.
I am looking for a lightweight source control system for use on hobby projects
I'm looking for a free/open source collaborative project manager that can be deployed internally
I'm looking for an open source search indexing library. It will be used for
I am looking for an open-source project involving c++ GUI(s) working with a database.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.