Home/ Questions/Q 538235
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-13T10:00:37+00:00

In looking up how to perform an equivalent to SELECT TOP 5 with LINQ-to-SQL,

  • 0

In looking up how to perform an equivalent to SELECT TOP 5 with LINQ-to-SQL, all the answers I’ve seen suggest using .Take(), like so:

var myObject = (
from myObjects in repository.GetAllMyObjects()
select myObject)
.Take(10);

I don’t yet understand most of how LINQ works behind-the-scenes but to my understanding of C-like languages this would resolve by first assigning a temporary array containing ALL records, then copying the first 10 elements in the array to var. Not such a problem if you’re working on a small dataset or without any performance constraints but it seems horribly inefficient to me if you’re, for example, selecting the most recent 5 log entries from a table which can contain millions of records.

Is my understanding of how this works wrong? If so, could someone explain what actually happens? Otherwise, what (if any) better (ie more efficient) way is there of only selecting x records through LINQ-to-SQL?

[edit]

I have the hypothetical myObject class sending LINQ-to-SQL output to the debug output as per the suggestion in the accepted answer. I ended up using the DebuggerWriter from here: http://www.u2u.info/Blogs/Kris/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=11

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    Your assumption is incorrect. With Linq to SQL, it evaluates to an Expression<Func<...>> which can be evaluated and the proper SQL generated. You do not need to worry about it loading all the records.

    Also, see this following question. You can attach a stream to your DataContext and see the SQL generated.
    How to get the TSQL Query from LINQ DataContext.SubmitChanges()

    • 0