Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6345231
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T20:46:56+00:00 2026-05-24T20:46:56+00:00

In many cases (such as function parameters) Pydev doesn’t statically know the type of

  • 0

In many cases (such as function parameters) Pydev doesn’t statically know the type of a variable. Therefore code completion (after . or when using ctrl+space) doesn’t work.

In most cases, you know what type will be in run-time as you are designing the software. Is there a way to hint Pydev to code completing it correctly?

I guess this may require a specific Pydev feature, or perhaps even a new Python PIP.

This is actually seems to be a generic problem with all dynamic languages…

UPDATE:
Perhaps an example is in place for clarification:

def some_func(a_list, an_object):
    a_list.app        # Here I would not get code completion for append

An example of something that could work, if Pydev (or a PIP) would support it:

from someobj import SomeObject
def some_func(a_list, an_object):
    # typecast: a_list=list
    # typecast: an_object=SomeObject
    a_list.app        # Now code completion would show append

I’m not endorsing this specific method – it’s just an example of a system that could work. Again, of course this should not be mandatory – but sometimes the lack of the possibility to hint the type is annoying.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T20:46:58+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 8:46 pm

    [Edit]

    Since PyDev 2.8.0, it can use docstrings and comments to discover the type of objects.

    See: http://pydev.org/manual_adv_type_hints.html for details on the supported formats.

    [Before PyDev 2.8.0]

    Previously, it only supported assert isinstance calls (and this still works):

    assert isinstance(a_list, list)
    

    PyDev will be able to recognize it and properly provide code-completion for it (note that you can run Python without the assertions later on if you find it’s making your code slower: What does Python optimization (-O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE) do? )

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In many prototype scripting cases, it's easier to just stick every form item (such
I know there are many cases which are good cases to use multi-thread in
I'm using c#. In many cases I'm writing code that can benefit from a
How would you fix the following bad code that passes too many parameters around?
First of all, there are many cases where Sleep() is misused , for example
In Python scripts, there are many cases where a keyboard interrupt (Ctrl-C) fails to
I'd like to use properties for my instance variables, but in many cases, I
I have an internal application in which one function is containing too many switch
In the System.Net namespace, there are very many different classes with similar names, such
I've got several function where I need to do a one-to-many join, using count(),

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.