In many situations I find that I need to create long-living values inside a function’s scope, and there is no need for this data to be at class/object scope.
For example,
object Example {
def activeUsers = {
val users = getUsersFromDB // Connects to the database and runs a query.
users.filter(_.active)
}
}
Above, the variable users is in the correct scope, but it will execute a database query everytime the function activeUsers is called.
To avoid this, I could move the variable users outside the function’s scope:
object Example {
val users = getUsersFromDB // Connects to the database and runs a query
def activeUsers = {
users.filter(_.active)
}
}
But that makes it available to other functions as well.
Else, I could create a separate object to enclose the function:
object Example {
object activeUsers {
val users = getUsersFromDB // Connects to the database and runs a query.
def apply() = {
users.filter(_.active)
}
}
}
But this involves more boilerplate code, use of another object and slight syntax oddities related to apply.
- Is there support for something like this at the language level?
- If not, is there any standard technique that you use in this situation?
Another option would be using a closure:
Explanation
activeUsersis a variable of typeFunction1[Unit, ...your filter result type...](or we can write this type as(Unit => ...your filter result type...), which is the same), that is this variable stores a function. Thus you may use it later in a way indistinguishable from function, likeactiveUsers()We initialize this variable with a block of code where we declare variable
usersand use it inside an anonymous function() => users.filter(_.active), hence it is a closure (as it has a bound variableusers).As a result, we achieve your goals: (1)
activeUserslooks like a method; (2)usersis calculated once; and (3)filterworks on every call.