Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8969629
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 15, 20262026-06-15T17:37:11+00:00 2026-06-15T17:37:11+00:00

In most cases, classes are known beforehand (e.g. Customer, Order); they’re described for ORMs

  • 0

In most cases, classes are known beforehand (e.g. Customer, Order); they’re described for ORMs (e.g. Entity Framework, LINQ to SQL, NHibernate, BLToolkit) using visual designers, attributes in code or configuration files. When you need to use objects of class Customer, for example, you can write strongly-typed queries like this:

db.Customers
  .Where(c => c.FirstName == "John")
  .Select(c => new { c.Id, c.LastName })
  .GroupBy(c => c.Id)

However, in my application, input data will be processed into models which are defined by users at runtime. Users will be able to add and remove properties, therefore I cannot define models in the code. The idea that this will require manually generating string SQL queries horrifies me. I’d like to be able to write code like this:

db.Tables["Customers"]
  .Where("c.FirstName = :FirstName")
  .Select(new[] { "c.Id", "c.LastName" })
  .GroupBy("c.Id")
  .Param(":FirstName", "John")

(Just example invented syntax.)

Question: is there a library for .NET which helps to construct complex SQL queries without defining models in the code first?

P.S. Looks like libraries like this exist, just not for .NET. I’d love to see something like SQLAlchemy, Ruby on Rails ActiveRecord, PHP Yii ActiveRecord, Django Models etc.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-15T17:37:12+00:00Added an answer on June 15, 2026 at 5:37 pm

    Solution to the problem: Simple.Data by Mark Rendle. It allows to write code like this without defining any classes or properties:

    Database.Open().Users.FindAllByEmail(email).FirstOrDefault()
    

    (It was mentioned in the description of the Rob Conery’s massive library.)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I refactor some classes from standard SQL to JPA/ORM usage. In most cases the
In most cases, I've been setting an event class handler that will apply to
In most cases if I want to create an optional feature in C, I
Preface: I'm know that in most cases using a volatile field won't yield any
Dealing with Java - which the option you prefer in the most cases -
I learned, that it is (at least in most cases) a good propgramming style
I'm using WiX 3 to setup my Web Application and most of the cases
I know, I know, there's a ton of simple answers that cover most cases
I realize that in most cases, it's preferred in Python to just access attributes
I need to XML serialize some classes, which in some cases do not adhere

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.