Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 507951
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T06:51:25+00:00 2026-05-13T06:51:25+00:00

In my application I am executing 10 asynchronous NSURLConnections within an NSOperationQueue as NSInvocationOperations.

  • 0

In my application I am executing 10 asynchronous NSURLConnections within an NSOperationQueue as NSInvocationOperations. In order to prevent each operation from returning before the connection has had a chance to finish I call CFRunLoopRun() as seen here:

- (void)connectInBackground:(NSURLRequest*)URLRequest {
 TTURLConnection* connection = [[TTURLConnection alloc] initWithRequest:URLRequest delegate:self];

 // Prevent the thread from exiting while the asynchronous connection completes the work.  Delegate methods will
 // continue the run loop when the connection is finished.
 CFRunLoopRun();

 [connection release];
}

Once the connection finishes, the final connection delegate selector calls CFRunLoopStop(CFRunLoopGetCurrent()) to resume the execution in connectInBackground(), allowing it to return normally:

- (void)connectionDidFinishLoading:(NSURLConnection *)connection {
    TTURLConnection* ttConnection = (TTURLConnection*)connection;
    ...
    // Resume execution where CFRunLoopRun() was called.
    CFRunLoopStop(CFRunLoopGetCurrent());
}

- (void)connection:(NSURLConnection *)connection didFailWithError:(NSError *)error {  
    TTURLConnection* ttConnection = (TTURLConnection*)connection;
    ...
    // Resume execution where CFRunLoopRun() was called.
 CFRunLoopStop(CFRunLoopGetCurrent());
}

This works well and it is thread safe because I bundled each connection’s response and data as instance variables in the TTURLConnection subclass.

NSOperationQueue claims that leaving its maximum number of concurrent operations as NSOperationQueueDefaultMaxConcurrentOperationCount allows it to adjust the number of operations dynamically, however, in this case it always decides that 1 is enough. Since that is not what I want, I have changed the maximum number to 10 and it seriously hauls now.

The problem with this is that these threads (with the help of SpringBoard and DTMobileIS) consume all of the available CPU time and cause the main thread to become latent. In other words, once the CPU is 100% utilized, the main thread is not processing UI events as fast as it needs to in order to maintain a smooth UI. Specifically, table view scrolling becomes jittery.

Process Name  % CPU
SpringBoard   45.1
MyApp         33.8
DTMobileIS    12.2
...

While the user interacts with the screen or the table is scrolling the main thread’s priority becomes 1.0 (the highest possible) and its run loop mode becomes UIEventTrackingMode. Each of the operation’s threads are 0.5 priority by default and the asynchronous connections run in the NSDefaultRunLoopMode. Due to my limited understanding of how threads and their run loops interact based on priorities and modes, I am stumped.

Is there a way to safely consume all available CPU time in my app’s background threads while still guaranteeing that its main thread is given as much of the CPU as it needs? Perhaps by forcing the main thread to run as often as it needs to? (I thought thread priorities would have taken care of that.)

UPDATE 12/23:
I have finally started getting a handle on the CPU Sampler and found most of the reasons why the UI was becoming jittery. First of all, my software was calling a library which had mutual exclusion semaphores. These locks were blocking the main thread for short periods of time causing the scroll to skip slightly.

In addition, I found some expensive NSFileManager calls and md5 hashing functions which were taking too much time to run. Allocating big objects too frequently caused some other performance hits in the main thread.

I have begun to resolve these issues and the performance is already much better than before. I have 5 simultaneous connections and the scrolling is smooth, but I still have more work to do. I am planning to write a guide on how to use the CPU Sampler to detect and fix issues that affect the main thread’s performance. Thanks for the comments so far, they were helpful!

UPDATE 1/14/2010:
After achieving acceptable performance I began to realize that the CFNetwork framework was leaking memory occasionally. Exceptions were randomly (however, rarely) being raised inside CFNetwork too! I tried everything I could to avoid those problems but nothing worked. I am quite sure that the issues are due to defects within NSURLConnection itself. I wrote test programs which did nothing except exercise NSURLConnection and they were still crashing and leaking.

Ultimately I replaced NSURLConnection with ASIHTTPRequest and the crashing stopped entirely. CFNetwork almost never leaks, however, there is still one very rare leak which occurs when resolving a DNS name. I am quite satisfied now. Hopefully this information saves you some time!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T06:51:26+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 6:51 am

    In practice you simply cannot have more than two or three background network threads and have the UI stay fully responsive.

    Optimize for user responsiveness, it’s the only thing a user really notices. Or (and I really hate to say this) add a “Turbo” button to your app that puts up a non-interactive modal dialog and increases concurrent operations to 10 while it is up.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 317k
  • Answers 317k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your question is not completely clear, but if you want… May 13, 2026 at 11:48 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This should work. I would trim the whitespace from the… May 13, 2026 at 11:48 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer someString.match(/\d+/)[0]; // 1234 Or, to specifically target digits following "comment_":… May 13, 2026 at 11:48 pm

Related Questions

I have a Silverlight 2 application that is consuming a WCF service. As such,
I am implementing an asynchronous command pattern for the client class in a client/server
I am in the process of creating a new team project by executing the
As far as I've gathered (read: measured), building the configuration and the sessionfactory by
I have an ASP.NET MVC application which is executing a search against a products

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.