Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 110243
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T02:11:47+00:00 2026-05-11T02:11:47+00:00

In my C# application, I have a large struct (176 bytes) that is passed

  • 0

In my C# application, I have a large struct (176 bytes) that is passed potentially a hundred thousand times per second to a function. This function then simply takes a pointer to the struct and passes the pointer to unmanaged code. Neither the function nor the unmanaged code will make any modifications to the struct.

My question is, should I pass the struct to the function by value or by reference? In this particular case, my guess is that passing by reference would be much faster than pushing 176 bytes onto the call stack, unless the JIT happens to recognize that the struct is never modified (my guess is it can’t recognize this since the struct’s address is passed to unmanaged code) and optimizes the code.

Since we’re at it, let’s also answer the more general case where the function does not pass the struct’s pointer to unmanaged code, but instead performs some read-only operation on the contents of the struct. Would it be faster to pass the struct by reference? Would in this case the JIT recognize that the struct is never modified and thus optimize? Presumably it is not more efficient to pass a 1-byte struct by reference, but at what struct size does it become better to pass a struct by reference, if ever?

Thanks.

EDIT:

As pointed out below, it’s also possible to create an ‘equivalent’ class for regular use, and then use a struct when passing to unmanaged code. I see two options here:

1) Create a ‘wrapper’ class that simply contains the struct, and then pin and pass a pointer to the struct to the unmanaged code when necessary. A potential issue I see is that pinning has its own performance consequences.

2) Create an equivalent class whose fields are copied to the struct when the struct is needed. But copying would take a lot of time and seems to me to defeat the point of passing by reference in the first place.

EDIT:

As mentioned a couple times below, I could certainly just measure the performance of each of these methods. I will do this and post the results. However, I am still interested in seeing people’s answers and reasonings from an intellectual perspective.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T02:11:47+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:11 am

    I did some very informal profiling, and the results indicate that, for my particular application, there is a modest performance gain for passing by reference. For by-value I got about 10,050,000 calls per second, whereas for by-reference I got about 11,200,000 calls per second.

    Your mileage may vary.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a large application that uses EJB 2.x entity beans (BMP). This is
I have a large Compact Frameworks V2.0 application that in most cases works very
I have a semi-large web application that we run locally and I need to
I have an application that is pretty memory hungry. It holds a large amount
I have an large application developed in .Net Compact Framework 1.0 that has been
I have a large application that I am working on in C++, and we
I have a large application (~50 modules) using a structure similar to the following:
We have fairly large C++ application which is composed of about 60 projects in
I have a large .NET web application. The system has projects for different intentions
I have a large tree of Java Objects in my Desktop Application and am

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.