Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 171963
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T13:04:52+00:00 2026-05-11T13:04:52+00:00

In my C++ main function, for example, if I had a pointer to a

  • 0

In my C++ main function, for example, if I had a pointer to a variable which uses heap memory (as opposed to stack memory) – is this automatically deallocated after my application exits? I would assume so.

Even so, is it good practice to always delete heap allocations even if you think they will never be used in a situation where the memory is automatically deallocated on exit?

For example, is there any point in doing this?

int main(...) {     A* a = new A();     a->DoSomething();     delete a;     return 0; } 

I was thinking maybe in case I refactor (or someone else refactors) that code and puts it elsewhere in the application, where delete is really necessary.

As well as the answer by Brian R. Bondy (which talks specifically about the implications in C++), Paul Tomblin also has a good answer to a C specific question, which also talks about the C++ destructor.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T13:04:53+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 1:04 pm

    It is important to explicitly call delete because you may have some code in the destructor that you want to execute. Like maybe writing some data to a log file. If you let the OS free your memory for you, your code in your destructor will not be executed.

    Most operating systems will deallocate the memory when your program ends. But it is good practice to deallocate it yourself and like I said above the OS won’t call your destructor.

    As for calling delete in general, yes you always want to call delete, or else you will have a memory leak in your program, which will lead to new allocations failing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 119k
  • Answers 119k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer IntelliJ is not free, but I think it's superior to… May 11, 2026 at 11:49 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Would this work: var answer1Sum = SurveyAnswers.Sum( survey => survey.Answer1… May 11, 2026 at 11:49 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer What you want is Microsoft's best practices for composite client… May 11, 2026 at 11:49 pm

Related Questions

EDIT: I suppose I should clarify, in case it matters. I am on a
Before asking you my question directly, I'm going to describe the nature of my
I understand that the Windows API uses classes, relying to the WNDCLASS / WNDCLASSEX
I'm writing a PHP5 extension, and while I could write it in C, it

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.