Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8848899
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T12:30:43+00:00 2026-06-14T12:30:43+00:00

In my c++ wrapper for the socket API I use the send and recv

  • 0

In my c++ wrapper for the socket API I use the send and recv functions as they have (nearly) the same signature. Linux offers a MSG_MORE flag which obtains that a message is not send till all partial messages are sent. Does windows offer the same?
MSDN docu tell me there are just two flags and no MSG_MORE. But I cant believe it.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T12:30:44+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 12:30 pm

    WSASend() and WSARecv(), the winsock equivalents of send() and receive() , have a MSG_PARTIAL flag which does the same thing. In general the winsock functions have more functionality than socket API on Windows.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want to write a C++ wrapper for the Linux Socket API. The method
I want to write a C++ wrapper for the Linux Socket API. In the
I don't understand when should we use stream wrapper and socket. Can anyone tell
I'm using the PHP sockets extension (basically a wrapper around the socket(2) -related linux
I have a wrapper class around some objects that I want to use as
I'm trying to use Moles to mock the Socket class in System.Net.Sockets. I have
I have a need for anonymous functions in php (soundcloud php wrapper) and so
I have a socket wrapper class that sends and recieves messages with a server
I am using a socket library (I'd rather not not use it) whose recv
Why does socket_base not have a send() method? Basically, I would like to use

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.