Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8595329
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T00:24:30+00:00 2026-06-12T00:24:30+00:00

In my DSL I want to be able to do like this: val a

  • 0

In my DSL I want to be able to do like this:

val a = 5

Parse("TYPE") {
  a match {
    case 3 => info("almost")
    case s: String => error("wrong type")
    case 5 => info("you won!")
    case _ => error("omg")
  }
}

with output

[INFO] TYPE: you won!

where Parse is a function object, which has the apply(String), info(String) and error(String) methods:

object Parse {

  def apply(name: String)(parseF: => Unit) { parseF }
  def info(text: String) { println("[INFO] " + name + ": " + text) }
  def error(text: String) { println("[ERROR] " + name + ": " + text) }

}

The trick is that the output of the info and error methods should be somehow native to the Parse object and construct the message by the example as shown above. Therefore, they

  1. have to be accessible like in the example, without any imports.
  2. have to have the access to the first argument passed to Parse() (“TYPE” in the example).
  3. must not create any instances or extra objects during their working.

This is an ideal description. I think that it will require some more boilerplate. Please suggest, how can I acheive that?

EDIT: my initial guess to declare the info and error methods inside the apply method does not make them visible in the parseF method being passed. Well, unsurprisingly..

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T00:24:31+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 12:24 am

    There is no solution that satisfies 1-3. You can have 1 and 2 or 2 and 3 with slightly different syntax.

    1 and 2)

    class Parse(val s:String) {
      def info....
    
    }
    
    new Parse("TYPE") {
    
    }
    

    2 and 3)

    object Parse {
      def apply(s:String)(f:String=>Unit) = ...
    }
    
    Parse("TYPE")(s => {
    
    })
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to build a DSL Solution using MsBuild and want to be able
For DSL purposes I want to detect methods defined like: def methodName() {} or
I have a DSL - like piece of Ruby code that looks like this:
I'm writing a small gem, and I want to define a DSL-like method, pretty
I want to make DSL construction for my class something like class Car brand
I want to write a simple DSL in C#. Nothing too complicated. I'm looking
I want to embed a dsl or existing full language within my application. It
I want to set the endpoint specific header value in Multicast component. XML DSL
I have a DSL Java object, i.e. a POJO which returns this in setters
I'm writing a DSL where the + operator is strictly numeric, like some other

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.