Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8486943
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T21:05:38+00:00 2026-06-10T21:05:38+00:00

In my OpenCL kernel, I find this: error += y; ++y; error += y;

  • 0

In my OpenCL kernel, I find this:

error += y;
++y;
error += y;
// The following test may be implemented in assembly language in
// most machines by testing the carry flag after adding 'y' to
// the value of 'error' in the previous step, since 'error'
// nominally has a negative value.
if (error >= 0)
{
    error -= x;
    --x;
    error -= x;
}

Obviously, those operations can easily be optimized using some nifty assembly instructions. How can I optimized this code in OpenCL?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T21:05:40+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 9:05 pm

    You don’t. The OpenCL compiler decides what to do with the code, depending on the target hardware and the optimization settings, which can be set as pragmas or as parameters when building the kernel. If it is smart enough, it’ll use the nifty assembly instructions for the platform on which the kernel is to be run. If not, well, it won’t.

    You have to keep in mind that OpenCL is a general framework applicable to many devices, not just your standard consumer-grade processor, so going “under the hood” is not really possible due to differences in assembly instructions (i.e. OpenCL is meant to be portable, if you start writing x86 opcodes in your kernel, how is it going to run on a graphics card for instance?)

    If you need absolute maximum performance on a specific device, you shouldn’t be using OpenCL, IMHO.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm a total beginner with OpenCL and I'm trying to make the following kernel
In OpenCL, can I set kernel argument as following? cl_uint a = 0; kernel.setArg(0,
I have an error in an OpenCL kernel, when I try to use the
I am thinking about reworking my GPU OpenCL kernel to speed things up. The
Is it possible to use custom types in OpenCL kernel like gmp types (mpz_t,
Being new to OpenCL i would like to know if the following scenario is
I'm running the OpenCL kernel below with a two-dimensional global work size of 1000000
Is there any way to stop OpenCL kernel from execution? For example, I launch
Given a float[n] inputdata to pass to the OpenCL kernel, could anyone enlighten me
In OpenCL what will be the consequences and differences between the following struct declarations.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.