Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
In my organization we use snk files with strong names assemblies. We generate the snk ourselves.
In addition we use a code signing signature on the binaries. We get the pfx from Verisign.
The snk and pfx are used for two different purposes. The snk is used for strong-naming, which uses a key pair to uniquely identify an assembly. The pfx is for code signing, which is a similar process but one that is intended to prevent malicious tampering with assemblies that are distributed publicly. Using both on an assembly both strong-names AND signs it.
It’s OK to generate your own SNK file as long as you keep the private key secure. The PFX file you get from Verisign allows you to sign the assembly using a key secured by a third party. This is an additional layer of security that lets users of your assembly know that it has not been tampered with.