Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7735031
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T07:23:55+00:00 2026-06-01T07:23:55+00:00

in my previous question Shared vectors in OpenMP it was stated that one can

  • 0

in my previous question
Shared vectors in OpenMP
it was stated that one can let diferent threads read and write on a shared vector as long as
the different threads access different elements of the vector.
What if different threads have to read all the (so sometimes the same) elements of a vector, like in the following case ?

#include <vector> 

int main(){

vector<double> numbers;
vector<double> results(10);
double x;

//write 25 values in vector numbers
for (int i =0; i<25; i++){
    numbers.push_back(cos(i));  
} 

#pragma omp parallel for default(none) \
shared(numbers, results) \
private(x)
    for (int j = 0;  j < 10;  j++){
        for(int k = 0; k < 25; k++){
            x += 2 * numbers[j] * numbers[k] + 5 * numbers[j * k / 25];
        }
        results[j]  =  x;     
    }

    return 0;

}

Will this parallelization be slow because only one thread at a time can read any element of the vector or is this not the case? Could I resolve the problem with the clause firstprivate(numbers)?

Would it make sense to create an array of vectors so every thread gets his own vector ?

For instance:

vector<double> numbersx[**-number of threads-**];
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T07:23:57+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 7:23 am

    Reading elements of the same vector from multiple threads is not a problem. There is no synchronization in your code, so they will be accessed concurrently.

    With the size of vectors that you are working with, you will not have any cache problems either, although for bigger vectors you may get some slow-downs due to the cache access pattern. In that case, separate copies of the numbers data would improve performance.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In previous question of mine, someone had meantioned that using Semaphores were expensive in
This question is related to a previous question of mine That's my current code
This question follows on from a previous question, that has raised a further issue.
Continuing from my previous question , is there a comprehensive document that lists all
My question is similar to my previous one, but this time I included the
Real-life case (helps understand the question) I am building a device that can freely
Per my previous question , I wish that a boost::shared_ptr<A> was actually a subclass
This is semi-related to my previous question . As that previous question states, I
This question relates to one of my previous ones . I'd like to have
This question is a derivative of a previous question: How to version resources that

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.