Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 636177
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T20:29:12+00:00 2026-05-13T20:29:12+00:00

In one of my c code file, one of the global variable which needs

  • 0

In one of my c code file, one of the global variable which needs to be update by almost every procedure in that file, is being locked and unlocked with mutex everytime and at every place.

In my knowledge using too much of synchronization with mutex’s lock and unlock definitely slow down the performance.

So, My query is that how can i gain at performance level or how can i reduce the use of mutex ?

I hope my question is clear else let me know.I shall try to be more clear.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T20:29:12+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 8:29 pm

    If using Windows, and synchronization is only needed within your application, use a CriticalSection instead. This is much faster than a Mutex.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I copied some Delphi code from one project to another, and found that it
I have a python module that makes use of a huge dictionary global variable,
I have a Capfile for Multistage deploys that needs to deploy the code to
How would one code the following C# code in Managed C++ void Foo() {
How can one allow code snippets to be entered into an editor (as stackoverflow
I'm looking for one line code examples in various languages for getting a valid
Say I have the following code: function One() {} One.prototype.x = undefined; function Two()
I lost the source code from one project I did on the company I'm
I'm changing our application from one set of code & one database to one
I am reading a .NET book, and in one of the code examples there

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.