Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6324535
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T16:43:21+00:00 2026-05-24T16:43:21+00:00

In our code we usually use the following pattern: Connection conn; try{ conn =

  • 0

In our code we usually use the following pattern:

Connection conn;
try{
    conn = getConnection();
    //Do databasey stuff
}catch(Exceptions that get thrown){
}finally{
    try{
        conn.close();
    }catch(SQLException ex){
        logger.error("Failed to cleanup database connection",ex);
    }
}

However findbugs doesn’t like this. Since conn.close() can throw an exception then the connection isn’t guaranteed to be closed.
Is findbugs being too pedantic or is there a better way to close database connections.

Edit:
Added removed try catch around close.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T16:43:22+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 4:43 pm

    What you really want to be doing is to combine “The Elite Gentleman”‘s answer with the @edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations.SuppressWarnings( "OBL_UNSATISFIED_OBLIGATION" ) annotation. FindBugs seems to only be happy if you the complete closing in method in the following manner (which is btw the preferred sequence for doing so):

    ...
    }finally{
        try{ 
           resultSet.close();
        }catch( SqlException e ){
           //log error
        }finally{
           try{
              statement.close();
           }catch( SqlException e ){
              //log error
           }finally{
              try{
                  connection.close();
              }catch( SqlException e ){
                  //log error
              }
           }
        }
    }
    

    Which is very verbose and you probably don’t want to do if for no other reason than the love of your carpal tunnel, thus you should use the DBUtils.closeQuietly() method (or create your own, your call). However, FindBugs doesn’t recognise this (i.e. using the library or your own method) as properly closing the resources and issues you a warning. In this case it is clearly a false positive. Therefore must make sure its the only warning you are getting and then disable that specific warning for that method.

    @edu.umd.cs.findbugs.annotations.SuppressWarnings( "OBL_UNSATISFIED_OBLIGATION" )
    public void doStuff( final Connection connection ){
        try{
            //Do databasey stuff
        }catch( SqlException e ){
            //throw a glorious exception....
        }finally{
            DbUtils.closeQuietly( resultSet  );
            DbUtils.closeQuietly( statement  );
            DbUtils.closeQuietly( connection );
    }
    

    This way you clean up your resources with the few lines of code and avoid a FindBugs warning.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We all know that commenting our code is an important part of coding style
I use Codesmith to create our code generation templates and have had success in
We use Incredibuild here to compile our code in a distributed fashion. I was
I know that there is no way to fully protect our code. I also
i want to know that why we use code behid approch. if there is
Our code sucks. Actually, let me clarify that. Our old code sucks. It's difficult
We usually catch unhandled exceptions in Global.asax, and then we redirect to a nice
Our code uses a lot of system properties eg, 'java.io.tmpdir', 'user.home', 'user.name' etc. We
In our code we used to have something like this: *(controller->bigstruct) = ( struct
In many places in our code we have collections of objects, from which we

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.