Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 47581
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T16:08:42+00:00 2026-05-10T16:08:42+00:00

In our current database development evironment we have automated build procceses check all the

  • 0

In our current database development evironment we have automated build procceses check all the sql code out of svn create database scripts and apply them to the various development/qa databases.

This is all well and good, and is a tremdous improvement over what we did in the past, but we have a problem with rerunning scripts. Obviously this isn’t a problem with some scripts like altering procedures, because you can run them over and over without adversly affecting the system. Right now to add metadata and run statements like create/alter table statements we add code to check and see if the objects exists, and if they do, don’t run them.

Our problem is that we really only get one shot to run the script, because once the script has been run, the objects are in the environment and system won’t run the script again. If something needs to change once it’s been deployed, we have a difficult process of running update scripts agaist the update scripts and hoping that everything falls in the correct order and all of the PKs line up between the environments (the databases are, shall we say, ‘special’).

Short of dropping the database and starting the process from scratch (the last most current release), does anyone have a more elegant solution to this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T16:08:43+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 4:08 pm

    I’m not sure how best to approach the problem in your specific environment, but I’d suggest reading up on Rail’s migrations feature for some inspiration on how to get started.

    http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/UnderstandingMigrations

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Our current web application is using SQL Server, we have a requirement for support
As part of our current database work, we are looking at a dealing with
At my company, our current method of updating the database is to connect using
Our current product is based on Eclipse RCP. We are starting to have problems
Our current MVC project is set up to have ViewModels that encapsulate the data
Our SQL Server 2000 instance hosts several databases which are all similar, one for
Our current application uses a smart object style for working with the database. We
In our current project, for some operations we send messages to Database like COMPLETED-Order,STARTED-Request,
We're getting ready to build a new platform for our current system. Currently we
We use SQL Server 2000/2005 and Vault or SVN on most of our projects.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.