Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6005841
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T01:27:16+00:00 2026-05-23T01:27:16+00:00

In our system we are reading user security groups from an Active Directory in

  • 0

In our system we are reading user security groups from an Active Directory in two slightly different ways. In one case the list of groups returned by the AD is missing the domain local groups. The response from GetAuthorizationGroups () is dependent on the used PrincipalContext. In the failing scenarios GetAuthorizationGroups() will only return global groups. The result is missing all domain local groups from the AD. Can anyone please explain why?

Failing solution:

PrincipalContext ctx = new PrincipalContext(ContextType.Domain, "our.domain.net");

var userPrincipal = UserPrincipal.FindByIdentity(ctx, IdentityType.UserPrincipalName, "userB");

PrincipalSearchResult<Principal> groups = userPrincipal.GetAuthorizationGroups();

In this case the process is executed by “UserA”. “UserA” is a member of the domain “our.domain.net”. “UserA” is the very same user as the specifically identified user in the working solution. The PrincipalContext should because of that be identical to the PrincipalContext in the working solution. The response from GetAuthorizationGroups() in this solution miss domain local groups from the AD.

Working solution:

PrincipalContext ctx = new PrincipalContext(ContextType.Domain, "our.domain.net", "UserA", "PasswordA");

var userPrincipal = UserPrincipal.FindByIdentity(ctx, IdentityType.UserPrincipalName, "userB");

PrincipalSearchResult<Principal> groups = userPrincipal.GetAuthorizationGroups();

In this case the calling user is identified specifically by use name and password when creating the Principal Context. In this case the AD returns all the groups that the user is a member of. This is the behavior I would like to see from the failing solution as well. In some cases I do not have the user password of UserA and of that reason the Working solution is not an option.

Please help me understand why the failing solution does not return all the groups that the user is a member of.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T01:27:17+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 1:27 am

    We finally found the problem. It turned out not to be a coding problem at all. The strange behaviour was caused by an erronious Domain Level in the Active Directory.

    Domain Level had to be set to “2003 functional level”

    Now it all works as expected.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Our system communicates with several web services providers. They are all invoked from a
Currently on our system, when a user contacts us, we reply via our admin
I'm exploring different ways of storing user-uploaded files (all are MS Office documents or
We don't have the .ogv format available from the encoder in our system, but
I'm trying to use T4 templates to make generating migrations for our system slightly
Our system dynamically generates a large report by converting many HTML pages into a
Our system will run on a local network with no more than 50 clients
Our system (exotic commodity derivative trade capture and risk management) is being redeveloped shortly.
A typical stored procedure in our system accepts around 20 or so parameters. There's
We use GNU Make for our system. At the end of our makefiles, we

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.